Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Misaki Matsuda vs Natalie Gaft Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matsuda vs Gaft analysis and find out who is favored!
Misaki Matsuda vs Natalie Gaft Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matsuda 1 - 0 Gaft
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matsuda has won 49.83% of points on his second serve, while Gaft has won 28.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matsuda, in recent form, has won 59.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gaft has won 55.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.42% and 34.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matsuda has saved 50.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaft has saved 44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matsuda has won 59.18% of matches played (W/L 29/ 20), with Gaft winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matsuda has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 10/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 64/ 52). Gaft has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Matsuda has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.18% of matches (W/L 29/ 20), where as Gaft has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matsuda winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Matsuda winning 2 and Gaft winning 0. The last match between Matsuda and Gaft was at the W35 Swan Hill, 20-03-2024, First, Grass with Misaki Matsuda getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Matsuda and Gaft have played a deciding set 0 times, with Matsuda winning 0 times and Gaft 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Matsuda winning 0, and Gaft 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matsuda has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.24 while Gaft has played against players with an average rank of 113.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matsuda has won 21% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaft has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matsuda has converted 49.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaft has converted 64.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
500
Rank
254
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
61% (158-100)
Career Total W/L
43% (6-8)
62% (18-11)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Misaki Matsuda | Natalie Gaft |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (39/53) | 51% (23/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (28/39) | 52% (12/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (7/14) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (26/45) | 34% (18/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Natalie Gaft
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Misaki Matsuda | Natalie Gaft |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (18/11) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 60% (6/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (345/282) | 55% (47/38) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:24 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 334.28 | 135.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (1468/1987) | 53% (95/178) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (854/1468) | 64% (61/95) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (259/519) | 29% (24/83) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (135/275) | 64% (9/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (978/2042) | 42% (65/156) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (18/11) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (23/16) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (23/7) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Misaki Matsuda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Meiqi Guo
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Misaki Matsuda
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
110)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
49 of
80)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Yukina Saigo
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Misaki Matsuda
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
102)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
50 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Ah Yun Seo
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Saki Imamura
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Misaki Matsuda
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
72%
(
77 of
107)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Natalie Gaft Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Natalie Gaft
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Natalie Gaft
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalie Gaft
Player
Georgiana Ruhrig
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
20%
(
5 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Natalie Gaft
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
8 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Natalie Gaft
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
38%
(
23 of
61)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Gaft
Player
Bridget Mihulka
46%
(
44 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
4
Aces
2
15
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Matsuda Vs Gaft Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Misaki Matsuda
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
